Algorithmic Sets
(Unterschied zwischen Versionen)
Mkurz (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Mkurz (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
Zeile 12: | Zeile 12: | ||
* So if a new predicate is needed only a new implementation of Predicate<T> needs to be implemented. | * So if a new predicate is needed only a new implementation of Predicate<T> needs to be implemented. | ||
* These Predicate<T> implementations can introduce configurable properties, for a more flexible solution. | * These Predicate<T> implementations can introduce configurable properties, for a more flexible solution. | ||
+ | * <b>Definition:</b> An algorithmic set is defined by a predicate. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Performance considerations == | ||
+ | * This approach is only reasonable if all tested elements are in memory, querying them from a database would be a suboptimal. | ||
+ | * If the amount of different |
Version vom 8. November 2014, 09:57 Uhr
Definition Algorithmic Set
- We want to define an algorithmic set via a Predicate deciding if an element is part of the set or not.
- In java we could use the functional interface Predicate<T>
public interface Predicate<T>{ // If test returns true, we consider the element be part of the algorithmic set. boolean test(T element); }
- Such a simple definition allows a polymorphic approach for defining set predicates.
- So if a new predicate is needed only a new implementation of Predicate<T> needs to be implemented.
- These Predicate<T> implementations can introduce configurable properties, for a more flexible solution.
- Definition: An algorithmic set is defined by a predicate.
Performance considerations
- This approach is only reasonable if all tested elements are in memory, querying them from a database would be a suboptimal.
- If the amount of different